An admin has some in their signature, and HDev has told me to make a formal complaint about it due to my finding it inappropriate to exist on MFGG, which he surely must agree with or else he would've handled it then and there.

I do agree, but the issue I find with this is determining where the line would be drawn between what's appropriate and what isn't. Though I suppose you could argue the same point about nudity if things like artistic nudity are taken into account. I wonder if someone were to post a drawing they did of a nude figure, how would that be handled.

A NSFW or 18+ label would be fine for me.

This is just a case of a newbie stumbling across an inclusive meme and not knowing where the inside joke came from or why it's funny.

[quote="Willsaber"]This is just a case of a newbie stumbling across an inclusive meme and not knowing where the inside joke came from or why it's funny.[/quote] I know where it came from and that it's funny, but I also think that if mfgg is set on being a very kid-friendly site, which it seems to be set on that, then this should probably not be allowed. I mean you can't even say curse words on here.

[quote="Willsaber"]This is just a case of a newbie stumbling across an inclusive meme and not knowing where the inside joke came from or why it's funny.[/quote] we all know about the yoshi vore fan game will that doesn't make it any less concerning that vore art is allowed in someone's signature for the record i don't really care, but since a thread of a fully clothed woman standing still was considered too risque for mfgg, i don't understand why this is ok

i really cant disagree with this im sorry coco

[quote="BlasterMaster"][quote="Willsaber"]This is just a case of a newbie stumbling across an inclusive meme and not knowing where the inside joke came from or why it's funny.[/quote] we all know about the yoshi vore fan game will[/quote] This actually doesn't come directly from Rachel's fangame. (although it is the same character)

Yeah, if someone can be hastily banned for posting fully clothed women being part of a concert, then softcore fetish is not appropriate. A NSFW or 18+ label are fine, but it is ridiculous that one user posting gifs of a concert that, afaik, don't have age restrictions can be banned but actual pornographic images for the, apparent to the unknowing, purpose to sexually please, is admin hosted. It is common sense on a forum aiming to attract children.

Yes but the image in said Admin's sig that you're talking about requires clicking on to open (which almost nobody will do), whereas the images being posted in that topic weren't behind any such restriction and could also be considered flooding. This whole topic feels a bit petty.

We already had this discussion back when Sloshy was around, and her game was deemed appropriate despite it being much more egregious than Coco's sig.