i think the PPP will start as that, its just a matter of balancing it out, rather than scorning eachother and pushing away. i agree with what kritter said as well.
EDIT: also, in case this got paged
Mit wrote:
i think getting people to agree on humor is a pointless endeavor at this point, not only because of the drama it's caused in off-topic MFGG related settings like chatrooms, but also because i'd rather have newbies form their own in-jokes and community than thrust what baggage us oldbies have onto them. it shouldn't ultimately be about "is this spam" or not, it should be "do i, personally, find this funny" and leaving it at that. because that's where most of my personal worry comes from- the potential hypocrisy that can come from regarding a joke one dislikes as spam, and shutting it down for that very reason, even though not everyone agrees. i think the idea of a joke being "spam" should be disregarded entirely in the context of a PPP especially.
in a way, i wanna go back on what i said and say a PPP could work and let people do what they want with it, purely so they can do what they want with it and make up their own new things. at the same time, i still think that this kind of thing would diminish the value of other posts retroactively, much like forum games. i would like to, rather than point them in one direction or another in terms of "what is funny", have them think a bit harder about what they're doing and have an actual punchline and goal with these jokes. the karnov thread had a structure and theme in mind, and i think it worked out pretty well.
also worth noting is that, with the new site revisions geared towards accessibility, the userbase SHOULD be younger as it becomes easier to use. they won't dominate, as they never really have, but they'll have more of a presence than they do now.
i think the PPP will start as that, its just a matter of balancing it out, rather than scorning eachother and pushing away. i agree with what kritter said as well.
EDIT: also, in case this got paged
[quote="Mit"]i think getting people to agree on humor is a pointless endeavor at this point, not only because of the drama it's caused in off-topic MFGG related settings like chatrooms, but also because i'd rather have newbies form their own in-jokes and community than thrust what baggage us oldbies have onto them. it shouldn't ultimately be about "is this spam" or not, it should be "do i, personally, find this funny" and leaving it at that. because that's where most of my personal worry comes from- the potential hypocrisy that can come from regarding a joke one dislikes as spam, and shutting it down for that very reason, even though not everyone agrees. i think the idea of a joke being "spam" should be disregarded entirely in the context of a PPP especially.
in a way, i wanna go back on what i said and say a PPP could work and let people do what they want with it, purely so they can do what they want with it and make up their own new things. at the same time, i still think that this kind of thing would diminish the value of other posts retroactively, much like forum games. i would like to, rather than point them in one direction or another in terms of "what is funny", have them think a bit harder about what they're doing and have an actual punchline and goal with these jokes. the karnov thread had a structure and theme in mind, and i think it worked out pretty well.
also worth noting is that, with the new site revisions geared towards accessibility, the userbase SHOULD be younger as it becomes easier to use. they won't dominate, as they never really have, but they'll have more of a presence than they do now.[/quote]