Vimimin wrote:
I prefer 3 categories, too. It's not needless bloat if it actually organizes the forums a little better, and the more you compress things the more everything will appear cluttered and disorganized, ironically. Anymore than 4 (even with any additional forums added) would be way too much, so I think 3 works just fine now. The initial option #1 that Blu proposed is ideal, imo
When we split the main boards into three categories, we have four sections total. Five even, if the staff boards are visible. That's too much.
EDIT: Also just realized Cruise's #2 is identical to mine. Should read before I post, derp. In that case I go with #2
[quote="Vimimin"]I prefer 3 categories, too. It's not needless bloat if it actually organizes the forums a little better, and the more you compress things the more everything will appear cluttered and disorganized, ironically. Anymore than 4 (even with any additional forums added) would be way too much, so I think 3 works just fine now. The initial option #1 that Blu proposed is ideal, imo[/quote]When we split the main boards into three categories, we have four sections total. Five even, if the staff boards are visible. That's too much.
EDIT: Also just realized Cruise's #2 is identical to mine. Should read before I post, derp. In that case I go with #2