By examining them and coming to a different conclusion than what the TV force fed you?
Quote:
You're discounting people's emotions
And since when did emotions matter? I'm not here to make some feel good argument, I'm here presenting evidence and inconsistencies. No one in this thread has rebutted the evidence. The hat, the internet activity, the closed casket funerals, the lack of photographic evidence of the UNALTERED crime scene... none of it can be explained away without factoring in a potential cover up.
And as for 9/11, what I find most hilarious is that the US authorities conveniently identified the hijackers so quickly because they "found their passports lying in the street" yet they could not recover the black box from the alleged aircraft ... an object made out of the most indestructible materials known to man. 'It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.'
[quote="Spritey"]
you're making light of serious tragedies
[/quote]
By examining them and coming to a different conclusion than what the TV force fed you?
[quote]
You're discounting people's emotions[/quote]
And since when did emotions matter? I'm not here to make some feel good argument, I'm here presenting evidence and inconsistencies.
No one in this thread has rebutted the evidence. The hat, the internet activity, the closed casket funerals, the lack of photographic evidence of the UNALTERED crime scene... none of it can be explained away without factoring in a potential cover up.
And as for 9/11, what I find most hilarious is that the US authorities conveniently identified the hijackers so quickly because they "found their passports lying in the street" yet they could not recover the black box from the alleged aircraft ... an object made out of the most indestructible materials known to man. 'It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.'
[img]https://s22.postimg.org/aaj9yfta9/chrome_2017-08-18_12-14-08.png[/img]
[img]https://s22.postimg.org/iu2nw71mp/chrome_2017-08-18_12-14-53.png[/img]
[img]https://s22.postimg.org/3ze2i0s1t/chrome_2017-08-18_12-15-17.png[/img]
Anyone wanna come claim that the news footage wasn't fabricated/doctored? I'm all ears.
https://youtu.be/gORu-68SHpE?t=14m
Seriously hilarious
for real though those images are hilarious "PRETTY CRAZY HOW MANY WOMEN WITH BROWN HAIR SHOW UP AT THESE TRAGEDIES I SMELL A CONSPIRACY............."
Pretty crazy how many similarly aged brown haired... wavy haired... women... with a very specific eyebrow shape and very similar facial features... seem to show up at all these tragedies... Almost seems like it's all the same woman. Hmm.
[quote="BlasterMaster"]for real though those images are hilarious
"PRETTY CRAZY HOW MANY WOMEN WITH BROWN HAIR SHOW UP AT THESE TRAGEDIES
I SMELL A CONSPIRACY............."[/quote]
Pretty crazy how many similarly aged brown haired... wavy haired... women... with a very specific eyebrow shape and very similar facial features... seem to show up at all these tragedies... Almost seems like it's all the same woman. Hmm.
EDIT: Upon request, here's a more accurate post about why this was locked.
The General Maturity rule is against: "Frequently instigating arguments or disrupting the community in some other, negative way."
This is the second time that this thread has come up, and I think this thread goes more to the side of "argument" than it does "debate". I also have the impression that Physix might be, not exactly trolling, but posting controversial stuff for fun. That would go against the "don't troll or bait" sensibilities in the Be Nice To One Another rule.
In general it's also a pretty negative thread that's hard to post in and seems to be going nowhere.
Below, spoiler'd, is my original post.
Spoiler:
Are you serious
There is home footage of the second plane hitting the tower
And I've refuted some of your arguments and you keep using them. And you refuted every argument you have in your first post with "any one of these things could be considered mere coincidence".
This is getting locked. No more of this please.
EDIT: Upon request, here's a more accurate post about why this was locked.
The General Maturity rule is against: "Frequently instigating arguments or disrupting the community in some other, negative way."
This is the second time that this thread has come up, and I think this thread goes more to the side of "argument" than it does "debate". I also have the impression that Physix might be, not exactly trolling, but posting controversial stuff for fun. That would go against the "don't troll or bait" sensibilities in the Be Nice To One Another rule.
In general it's also a pretty negative thread that's hard to post in and seems to be going nowhere.
Below, spoiler'd, is my original post.
[spoiler]Are you serious
There is home footage of the second plane hitting the tower
And I've refuted some of your arguments and you keep using them. And you refuted every argument you have in your first post with "any one of these things could be considered mere coincidence".
This is getting locked. No more of this please.[/spoiler]
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum