No offense, but this quiz is terrible at assessing "digital literacy". Most of this stuff is just random trivia, some of it is subjective, and some of it is specific to certain programs that not everyone uses. Not being a user of Microsoft Excel does not make someone "computer illiterate". Neither does being bad at
designing a slideshow presentation.
I also contest the "correct" answers on some of these questions:
Quote:
Which port would you be most likely to use to connect a modern printer to your desktop computer? USB port
I'll grant that that's the port you would likely use
if you connected to the printer with a cable, but most printers these days are capable of just connecting to the wireless network and being accessed that way.
Quote:
Katie is making a new e-mail account. She plans to use this new account for her small business and wants to minimize the risk of other people hacking into her account. Which of the following would be a strong password for her account? s0ybeanSoybe@nSandw!ch*1992
In fact, even this "correct" password is quite weak. This is an old approach to making passwords which is crackable now,
especially because each word is only being given one common substitution. All that needs to be done is to try words with these common substitutions from a dictionary. It won't be instantaneous, but it's a lot faster than brute-force and can get the job done.
The only passwords that are actually strong are:
1. Randomly generated passwords. This is the preferred approach; a password database via something like KeePass helps with this.
2. Really long phrases. If you have enough words it's not composed of common phrases, then even someone who knows your exact method will effectively need to brute-force the password, but with a dictionary of thousands of words, not just 50 characters or so. Example: "You could like killing kittens, but if I were there, I would blacken your face before you could do so."
3. Long phrases with words substituted for a character or two. Example, based on the previous example: "uCdlkK,bfIwr3r,1WdblkurFb4Ucds."
Quote:
You just read an online article and you want to evaluate whether the information on it is accurate. Which of the following does the least to ensure that an article is accurate and credible? Lots of cool pictures
Putting aside that this is a question about skepticism, not "computer literacy", yeah, that does nothing to show credibility. But neither does the presence of a copyright date. All a recent copyright date shows is that the website is still being updated. I'd bet Infowars has a copyright date on its website.
No offense, but this quiz is terrible at assessing "digital literacy". Most of this stuff is just random trivia, some of it is subjective, and some of it is specific to certain programs that not everyone uses. Not being a user of Microsoft Excel does not make someone "computer illiterate". Neither does being bad at [i]designing[/i] a slideshow presentation.
I also contest the "correct" answers on some of these questions:
[quote]Which port would you be most likely to use to connect a modern printer to your desktop computer? USB port[/quote]
I'll grant that that's the port you would likely use [i]if[/i] you connected to the printer with a cable, but most printers these days are capable of just connecting to the wireless network and being accessed that way.
[quote]Katie is making a new e-mail account. She plans to use this new account for her small business and wants to minimize the risk of other people hacking into her account. Which of the following would be a strong password for her account? s0ybeanSoybe@nSandw!ch*1992[/quote]
In fact, even this "correct" password is quite weak. This is an old approach to making passwords which is crackable now, [i]especially[/i] because each word is only being given one common substitution. All that needs to be done is to try words with these common substitutions from a dictionary. It won't be instantaneous, but it's a lot faster than brute-force and can get the job done.
The only passwords that are actually strong are:
1. Randomly generated passwords. This is the preferred approach; a password database via something like KeePass helps with this.
2. Really long phrases. If you have enough words it's not composed of common phrases, then even someone who knows your exact method will effectively need to brute-force the password, but with a dictionary of thousands of words, not just 50 characters or so. Example: "You could like killing kittens, but if I were there, I would blacken your face before you could do so."
3. Long phrases with words substituted for a character or two. Example, based on the previous example: "uCdlkK,bfIwr3r,1WdblkurFb4Ucds."
[quote]You just read an online article and you want to evaluate whether the information on it is accurate. Which of the following does the least to ensure that an article is accurate and credible? Lots of cool pictures[/quote]
Putting aside that this is a question about skepticism, not "computer literacy", yeah, that does nothing to show credibility. But neither does the presence of a copyright date. All a recent copyright date shows is that the website is still being updated. I'd bet Infowars has a copyright date on its website.