Isn't that how top five voting works, though? The people outside of the top five range (or in this case, top seven, since three people have tied for 5th) get eliminated, which happens to be case for Psid, unfortunately. Yeah, it kind of seems dumb and cruel to eliminate just only one person, but that's how it works. I'm not sure what else could work.

Anyway, I think I'll vote for SuperArthurBros.

well, it just seems a little pointless to eliminate one person out of seven in a top five. You should have had a tie-breaker vote for the fifth person, imo

I agree. Top 5 shouldn't be named like that if there's more than five top 5. But... I think the best thing to do is to rename the top 5 badge to participant, so everyone who enters the competition gets rewarded with something at least and no one is left in the dark without any badges for participating. This is like Black Boo said: "it will quicken the process of competitions and allow more to happen over the course of the year". Also, if there are lots of entries in one competition (like over 15), even if everyone makes great entries, with top 5 badges there's gonna be a lot of subjectivity (all competitions have subjectivity since votes are based on subjective opinions), but even more subjectivity than most competitions and you will need to rely entirely on luck to get a top 5 badge. It's pretty unfair. It would be better to simply reward everyone for their effort.

Back on topic, I vote Transpencil

A potential solution I just thought of was to instead give everyone five slots for voting in a single voting period. However, the value of the votes--or points in this case--will descend dependent on the listed entries. For example:

1. Person A
2. Person B
3. Person C
4. Person D
5. Person E

Person A receives 5 points because they're at the top of the list. Meanwhile, person B receives 4, C receives 3, D 2, and E 1. The points are determined in descending order of how the voter lists the entries based on preference.