Syaxamaphone wrote:
Maybe a little nitpicky, but the way its worded it sounds like only leaks wouldn't count. And if this same information was again reiterated at E3 then it would count?
Hmm, fair point. I suppose a better method would be that your don't have to change your card, but if your info isn't presented at E3, then you simply don't get to check off that spot as it didn't happen there.
Zero Kirby wrote:
Chaoxys wrote:
words words words words words
You're still not giving me a good reason besides "well it's called E3 Bingo ergo only E3 things should count because it's called E3 Bingo"
... What? So a game that has you playing Bingo with things brought up at E3 shouldn't focus on E3? I don't get your logic.
Zero Kirby wrote:
If the exact same problem could happen a week before E3 or a month before E3, then maybe consider a way to actually fix the problem. If the problem isn't the user's fault (and it really isn't) then it's a problem with the actual game itself.
I mean, again, I could make my card a month in advance, then have all of the squares invalidated four days before E3. I know it's a ridiculous example but it could happen. By your logic, I now do not have enough time to make a new one! How is this fair?
Like I just said in the quote to Syaxamaphone, I'm going to revise it to where basically if anything revealed in the month before E3 ALSO shows up at E3, it will count, however it HAS to show up at E3, because yes, this is E3 Bingo, it is sort of the key focus. That said, based on the original rule set, you wouldn't have to make a new one, those 4 that were invalidated simply wouldn't be checked off. Again though, due to the rule change, thats no longer an issue (provided it's still shown at E3).
Zero Kirby wrote:
Also you say it's in the rules but there's an edit in the rules post dated after this whole debacle started. Do you have the original post? If I missed it originally, then that's fine, I should have paid more attention to it, but I still argue the rule itself is not a good one.
All I did was add a single thing "The only exception is if something is revealed that is tied directly to E3, for example, if a trailer is put on youtube designating it as their "official E3 trailer"." So basically, I added the thing I mentioned before with Syaxamaphone, although not as fleshed out, although I'm about to update it a bit more.
DJ Coco wrote:
quotes
Can you just tell us what it is? Making additional quotes isn't helping anyone because I still can't see what he did on his card that breaks a rule.
[quote="Syaxamaphone"]Maybe a little nitpicky, but the way its worded it sounds like only leaks wouldn't count. And if this same information was again reiterated at E3 then it would count?[/quote]
Hmm, fair point. I suppose a better method would be that your don't have to change your card, but if your info isn't presented at E3, then you simply don't get to check off that spot as it didn't happen there.
[quote="Zero Kirby"][quote="Chaoxys"]words words words words words[/quote]
You're still not giving me a good reason besides "well it's called E3 Bingo ergo only E3 things should count because it's called E3 Bingo"[/quote]
... What? So a game that has you playing Bingo with things brought up at E3 shouldn't focus on E3? I don't get your logic.
[quote="Zero Kirby"]
If the exact same problem could happen a week before E3 or a month before E3, then maybe consider [i]a way to actually fix the problem[/i]. If the problem isn't the user's fault (and it really [i]isn't[/i]) then it's a problem with the actual [i]game itself[/i].
I mean, again, I could make my card a month in advance, then have all of the squares invalidated four days before E3. I know it's a ridiculous example but it could happen. By your logic, I now do not have enough time to make a new one! How is this fair?
[/quote]
Like I just said in the quote to Syaxamaphone, I'm going to revise it to where basically if anything revealed in the month before E3 ALSO shows up at E3, it will count, however it HAS to show up at E3, because yes, this is E3 Bingo, it is sort of the key focus. That said, based on the original rule set, you wouldn't have to make a new one, those 4 that were invalidated simply wouldn't be checked off. Again though, due to the rule change, thats no longer an issue (provided it's still shown at E3).
[quote="Zero Kirby"]Also you say it's in the rules but there's an edit in the rules post dated [i]after[/i] this whole debacle started. Do you have the original post? If I missed it originally, then that's fine, I should have paid more attention to it, but I still argue the rule itself is not a good one.[/quote]
All I did was add a single thing "The only exception is if something is revealed that is tied directly to E3, for example, if a trailer is put on youtube designating it as their "official E3 trailer"." So basically, I added the thing I mentioned before with Syaxamaphone, although not as fleshed out, although I'm about to update it a bit more.
[quote="DJ Coco"]quotes[/quote]
Can you just tell us what it is? Making additional quotes isn't helping anyone because I still can't see what he did on his card that breaks a rule.