Miles wrote:
If he doesn't, then warning him that we may try to 'take over' his site through ICANN's Domain Name Dispute process may get him to break.
[...]
I wonder if it might be possible to get a C&D order on them... if that was possible, then they would have to comply. And, if they failed to do so, they would end up in legal trouble.
Stop.You took my posts out of context there. I had seen that post, but like I said after the main bit that you quoted - and this is the important bit:
ah2190 wrote:
...but that's wishing too much.
I said that because a) using LAW would most likely be out of the question, (Especially after what that post said) and b) even if it was, it's highly unlikely that we COULD get a C&D order made in the first place.
[quote="Miles"][quote="[url=http://phpbb.mfgg.net/viewtopic.php?p=340121#p340121]ah2190[/url]"]If he doesn't, then warning him that we may try to 'take over' his site through ICANN's Domain Name Dispute process may get him to break.
[...]
I wonder if it might be possible to get a C&D order on them... if that was possible, then they would have to comply. And, if they failed to do so, they would end up in legal trouble.[/quote]
[url=http://phpbb.mfgg.net/viewtopic.php?p=340134#p340134]Stop.[/url]
[/quote]
You took my posts out of context there. I had seen that post, but like I said after the main bit that you quoted - and this is the important bit:
[quote="ah2190"]...but that's wishing too much.[/quote]
I said that because a) using LAW would most likely be out of the question, (Especially after what that post said) and b) even if it was, it's highly unlikely that we COULD get a C&D order made in the first place.